Candled Natural Pearls

I have no idea, Charmed! I forgot I even had these, they were part of a treasure box that I inherited maybe 10 years ago, with mish-mash of beads and stones. It is drilled all the way through though, so I don't know if that makes a difference when it comes to interpreting what the light is doing inside the pearl.

Here's some of a mississippi river pearl:
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2654 (485x491).jpg
    DSCN2654 (485x491).jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 95
  • DSCN2655 (426x491).jpg
    DSCN2655 (426x491).jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 83
  • DSCN2656 (491x369).jpg
    DSCN2656 (491x369).jpg
    88.6 KB · Views: 98
  • DSCN2657 (491x489).jpg
    DSCN2657 (491x489).jpg
    10.4 KB · Views: 93
  • DSCN2659 (465x491).jpg
    DSCN2659 (465x491).jpg
    10 KB · Views: 89
  • DSCN2660 (491x445).jpg
    DSCN2660 (491x445).jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 104
LOL Andrea! You are doing so well with candling. Your photos are perfect!! BTW, how lucky are you to inherit such lovely gems!!
 
I can't wait to see how you resolved your pendant candling quandary... bated breath over here!
The mish-mash box was my stepmom's father in-law's (what a mouthful!) who was a dentist and liked to toy around with making jewelry. When he passed away my stepmom didn't know what to do with all the tools and stones and beads and knowing that I liked to play around as well gave the whole shebang to me. Needless to say, I was pretty happy about that ;)

Dave: do you think that the bead hole affects what the light does in the pearl?
 
Dave: do you think that the bead hole affects what the light does in the pearl?

Not necessarily. Drilling might remove some identifiable material, but I don't think it will affect the way light behaves.

Many pearls we'll candle from now on will either be drilled or mounted and that will have to be considered when reading the views.
 
Okay well I used a ring that I assumed was a cultured pearl, but now I have no idea what I'm seeing, so maybe it is and maybe I'm doing the candling thing wrong. I'll try to do it with a CFWP.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2697 (491x491).jpg
    DSCN2697 (491x491).jpg
    11.8 KB · Views: 91
  • DSCN2698 (491x436).jpg
    DSCN2698 (491x436).jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 99
  • DSCN2701 (491x476).jpg
    DSCN2701 (491x476).jpg
    9.2 KB · Views: 96
  • DSCN2706 (491x437).jpg
    DSCN2706 (491x437).jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 94
  • DSCN2708 (491x453).jpg
    DSCN2708 (491x453).jpg
    15.8 KB · Views: 101
  • DSCN2709 (370x491).jpg
    DSCN2709 (370x491).jpg
    14.8 KB · Views: 87
This is a CFWP bead. I can't see the bead in the pearl from the side shot, so maybe side shots are worthless? But I think I can see it from the straight down shot.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2711 (491x434).jpg
    DSCN2711 (491x434).jpg
    14 KB · Views: 89
  • DSCN2712 (491x452).jpg
    DSCN2712 (491x452).jpg
    11.7 KB · Views: 99
  • DSCN2714 (491x459).jpg
    DSCN2714 (491x459).jpg
    12.8 KB · Views: 85
The modeling clay is obscuring the outer margins. It's much better to have an over all view and to allow the light to escape. While partially enclosed, light can reflect back into the object.

I haven't used clay to hold the pearl, just gravity and a hole smaller than the pearl's diameter.
 
Okay well I used a ring that I assumed was a cultured pearl, but now I have no idea what I'm seeing, so maybe it is and maybe I'm doing the candling thing wrong. I'll try to do it with a CFWP.

I can't see the outer margin either, it's probably very thin, but I can see the featureless appearance of the bead itself. No streaks, not patches, no dark spots.

It's a good example!
 
The modeling clay is obscuring the outer margins. It's much better to have an over all view and to allow the light to escape. While partially enclosed, light can reflect back into the object.

I haven't used clay to hold the pearl, just gravity and a hole smaller than the pearl's diameter.

Okay, I will give that a shot with the ring and see if it makes a difference for you, lol!
 
ring minus clay
 

Attachments

  • DSCN2724 (491x472).jpg
    DSCN2724 (491x472).jpg
    15.8 KB · Views: 99
  • DSCN2727 (491x369).jpg
    DSCN2727 (491x369).jpg
    103.4 KB · Views: 97
  • DSCN2736 (491x421).jpg
    DSCN2736 (491x421).jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 96
Much better!

The center is quite diffused, typical of beaded nuclei. You can also see the surface of the bead in the first image.
 
Almost the whole thing is a bead, with a thin layer of nacre covering it. The last photo in the array shows it quite clearly.
 
I've simplified my setup (klenex box upside down with a led flashlight) and took picture with my Iphone. The result in the picture is not necessarely what I see with the naked eye. In this case, the bead is more visible on the picture.

Here is what I think is a well worn akoya earring (probably from the 60's)

image.jpg
image.jpg
image.jpg
 
Can definitely see the bead in that ear stud. The nacre appears quite thick.

On another note, I have several naturals yet to be candled, but like amber, it's my hope I'll find a pearl with a discernible critter inside it, perhaps a crab or snail. I have some that appear to have a polydora (worm) inside, but it's hard to say for sure, as they could just be streaks of conchiolin.
 
[On another note, I have several naturals yet to be candled, but like amber, it's my hope I'll find a pearl with a discernible critter inside it, perhaps a crab or snail]

That would be fascinating!

On my side, I'd be also interested in finding traces of tissue grafting in cultured pearls . Finding the markers like you do for naturals would be very interesting too !
 
Back
Top