barbie biggs
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Messages
- 808
We're all so addicted to luster. It sounds like some eerie kind of drug.
May I ask where did you purchase this strand? It is so beautiful. I am on a quest for a Tahitian baroque, probably aqua tones, though.
The zoom in feature is something we have considered in the past. I do not like the one on Pearl Source, however. If we did decide to use one we would use one similar to Angela Carol. It is much more user friendly.
But there is one question that comes up with the "zoom" feature. If P. Source is using a generic photo and the photographed piece is not the one the customer will receive, what is the point of having the zoom feature? Its purpose is primarily to examine inclusions. Color and luster can be viewed in a 3x5 picture. In pieces that are absolutely certain to be generic photos, like freshwater and akoya, use of such a feature would certainly be misleading in my opinion. What good does it do to examine a generic photo under a loupe?
I purchased the strand from Elaine (ebwootten). The pearls on the strand are from Josh's farm
jody said:Hi
I like the look of these two necklaces, though price does vary quite a bit between the two. The more expensive one has around the same size pearls, excellent luster and same quality, AA.
http://www.thepearlsource.com/8-10m...e-Baroque-Pearl-Necklace_10_collection_92.htm
The less expensive strand is also AA, around the same size pearls, (though there is a typo about size, think it is 8.26-10.8mm, not 9.26) but would one assume the luster perhaps is not as high? It is not stated, so I'm thinking that is the reason for the lower cost.
http://www.pearlparadise.com/detail.aspx?ID=2013