Quick Q?

Look at this...........

In recent years the Tridacna Gigas clam has moved from the endangered species list, to a "closely watched" list. the US Fish & Wildlife Service now allows importing by quota, and from aquaculture
farms. LINK
It is on the Iucn list as "Vulnerable". Its habitat is very large, from N australia to sulawesi, east coast of Malay, Saba, Palawan and Fiji.

Though China now buys at least some of them from aquaculture farms, poaching is still a big problem.
 
Make no mistake, these critters are protected, but some sources are of "least concern" and eating by first peoples often occurs.
This was a chart on a CITIES page.
Range States selected for review LINK
Range State Exports* (1994-2003)
Urgent, possible or least concern
Comments

Australia ca 16,000 kg shells & 320 shells. Least concern Considerable quantities of captive-bred exports; mariculture. facility not approved for T. gigas
Comoros No exports Least concern No exports; not knows as range State
Fiji 1,000 live, 200 shells. Least concern Species probably introduced; recorded level of export low (ca 120 specimens a year).

Micronesia Minimal trade Least concern Minimal trade


Japan No exports Least concern No exports

Kiribati Minimal trade Least concern Minimal trade
Malaysia Minimal trade Least concern Minimal trade
Marshall islands. Minimal trade Least concern Minimal trade
Myanmar No exports Least concern No exports
Palau Minimal trade Least concern Minimal trade
Papua New Guinea Minimal trade Least concern Minimal trade
Tonga Minimal trade Least concern Minimal trade
Vanuatu Minimal trade Least concern Minimal trade
Viet Nam 29,000 kg, shells, 100 live. Least concern Not definitely known as range State; shell export recorded in a single year (2000); apart from 100 live specimens in 2002, no subsequent export of T. gigas or of Tridacna spp. or Tridacnidae spp.




*Excluding re-exports
It looks like exports are the dangerous acts, not local eating and trade.
 
Last edited:
I am all for saving endagered species and their habitats. But I have question for you. If you are in a community that live of the sea for food. Not for profit were you sell what you catch. And this places are far from advancing civilization, they would not know what's endangered and what's not. All they know is they have to feed their family. Are this people wrong. And if they happen to stumble on a pearl , are they plundering?


You're presenting a situation ethic rather than a legal one. Of course, no one would deny people of an EXCLUSIVE food source regardless of it's scarcity. They would find ways to cultivate it to prevent extinction. That being said, this is not that type of scenario. Which is why governments form bonds which support each other's concerns. Governments have a way of communicating their legalities and ignorance is seldom an excuse to violate.

Stumbling onto a pearl from an endangered species is one thing. Attempting to sell it for profit is quite another.

Segue ... for a non-nacreous pearl to have value, it has to be extremely unusual. Your pearl is not a gem and not terribly large of it's kind. Flame patterns and rare colors make non-nacreous pearls valuable, unless it has some really great tale to go with it.

Is there anything particularly unusual about your pearl which makes it a source of interest to a collector?
 
knotty panda said:
... for a non-nacreous pearl to have value, it has to be extremely unusual. Your pearl is not a gem and not terribly large of it's kind.

Hi Knotty,

Well said.

Yeah, lucky for the Tridacna gigas that it does not produce any nacreous beauties, :eek:!! Now how did Josh so romantically describe a giant clam concretion again? Oh yes---"a lump looking like a cold piece of lard".

Slraep
 
Great information guys.... Seee I would not have known all the little things with regards to pearls if it wasn't for your honest words. ---"a lump looking like a cold piece of lard". thats pretty funny but true...
 
Tridacna Gigas is a protected species in many countries - be warned! :eek:

Hello

What are the news about the new bead nucleated China pearls wit tails, are they or are they not nucleated with that clam?
And is it or not forbidden ?
thus, are these pearls still " ethical" ?


Thanks
 
here it is finaly:)
 

Attachments

  • P5270371.jpg
    P5270371.jpg
    12.3 KB · Views: 57
OH MY! He can put his shirt back on now! (That is a pretty big one, all right!)

Pattye
so many pearls, so little time
 
OH MY! He can put his shirt back on now! (That is a pretty big one, all right!)

Pattye
so many pearls, so little time

You made me snort! I feel some guilt, but I have to say it - that is one butt-ugly excretion. :eek:
 
I think that is very hard to say, probably it is (as always) depending on what a possible collector thinks it is worth...

If you have sold it, please let us know. Personally I like beautiful, round pearls with much luster and I don?t think this "pearl" does fit this category.:eek:
 
Finally here are the stats. 5 lbs (2.26 kg)
14 x 12.5 x 9 cm
white
good luster
surface : lightly
Non Blister nacreous "Pearl"
 
Back
Top