Pearl diver dies in Broome

Younger than my children are. Heartbreaking.
 
Diving is inherently dangerous.

No accidents like this in twenty years, indicate the diving industry has done well to properly certify divers and regulate the short and long term exposure to pressure.

It's always sad to hear about the loss of one of our own.
 
You can be sure there will be a pretty comprehensive look into it.

I'm pretty sure there was a diver death at Arafura Pearls in the Territory in 09.

I didn't read it in the new's, an employee of mine had come from there and several of their employee's called us for jobs and explained the accident.

Dave our diving industry is very well regulated but, as you say, diving is dangerous.

The company involved are well known for looking after their staff.
 
Paspaley diver's death raising safety questions

Paspaley diver's death raising safety questions

Australian Broadcasting Corporation investigation into the death of a young Paspaley diver. It looks as though their safety standards do not befit a wealthy country...

Australia's biggest pearl producer was warned it would have a serious workplace accident or fatality only months before the death of a young pearl diver, a Four Corners investigation reveals.

Jarrad Norton, a former pearl diver with Paspaley Pearls, says that at the end of last year he told the company, "I promise you, I guarantee you, next year you'll have a serious accident or a fatality unless something changes".

His prediction came tragically true at the beginning of this year's pearling season when Melbourne man Jarrod Hampton died in April while diving for Paspaley Pearls off the coast south of Broome.

Mr Hampton, 22, was employed as a drift diver, a job which involves collecting shells from the sea bed while being towed under water from a boat.

In an investigation prompted by Mr Hampton's death, Four Corners raises serious questions about workers' safety in an industry that brings in more than $100 million a year for the family-owned company, Paspaley Pearls.

The program examines the adequacy of rescue equipment, safety procedures and training in the pearling industry which does not follow some standards seen as best practice in most other occupational diving.
Audio: Pearl diving safety under scrutiny (AM)

The safety warning to Paspaley came last year, after a number of experienced divers quit the company.

The divers have told Four Corners they left Paspaley after their pay was effectively cut by about $20,000 per season.

Several divers wrote to the company warning the low pay rate would make it hard for Paspaley to hold onto its experienced divers.

When the company did not offer any more money, divers began leaving and many were replaced by new divers with no experience in the specialised and dangerous work of drift diving.

The new divers included Mr Hampton, who, though he was a qualified scuba instructor, was new to drift diving.

Of the eight divers on the boat, five were first time drift divers.

Mr Hampton died on his second day on the job. According to preliminary investigations, his death was consistent with drowning.

"With a mass exodus like that, you can't put that many green divers into the water with a few experienced guys to look after them," former head company diver Mick Case told Four Corners.
'No concerns'
Robyn Hampton and Tony Hampton Photo: Tony and Robyn Hampton say they want to see safety measures improved. (Four Corners)

A spokesman for the pearling industry, Brett McCallum, says the industry does not plan to make any changes to its operation.

"The authorities have no concerns in regards to how we are operating at the moment," he told Four Corners.

Paspaley Pearls issued a statement to the program, saying safety is its highest priority.

"Paspaley has been a leader in driving safety improvements across the pearl diving industry, which have led to significant declines in serious dive-related incidents over the past four decades," the statement said.

Mr Hampton's family is devastated by his death. His father, Tony Hampton, says Jarrod was "excited about the whole idea of Paspaley Pearls".

"The website spruiked world standard safety conditions - it was a big company with great equipment," he said.

In the wake of Jarrod's death, the Hampton family says it wants to see safety measures improved on diving boats.
 
Who or what is Four Corners?
The reason I ask is that when there is this sort of accident/incident/death happens someone always comes out of the woodwork to say 'I told you this would happen'
I assume that there is an ongoing full coroner's investigation so it would be much better and less sensationalist to wait to see what actually happened.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't even begin to guess where blame lies, but that is just terribly sad.
 
In defense of Paspaley and as a person with extensive commercial diving experience, the amount of money paid has little or nothing to do with a diver's personal safety. I've been on dive jobs where I was paid poorly, or not at all for one reason or another. That never stopped me from properly maintaining my equipment, caused me to defer from the depth tables or not paying attention to my surroundings. Commercial divers need to be in top physical condition and nobody but themselves are able to facilitate that. In so-called wealthy countries, there is no company, agency or individual that can force anyone into the water when they feel it isn't safe or not up to the task.
 
Who or what is Four Corners?
The reason I ask is that when there is this sort of accident/incident/death happens someone always comes out of the woodwork to say 'I told you this would happen'
I assume that there is an ongoing full coroner's investigation so it would be much better and less sensationalist to wait to see what actually happened.

Hi Pearlescence,

Four Corners is Australian Public Television's most respected investigatory journalism program. They check their facts, there's a big legal team at the ABC, it's all highly professional. No, I disagree, there's no need to wait for a coroner's report for an investigative journalist to get cracking. The program will be available for anyone to view online once it has been broadcast - if Paspaley were available for interview, they will have had the opportunity to put their side of the story. It appears to have been very important to the poor diver's parents to have their say. And one thing is fact: Paspaley did not have the recommended medical staffer available on the boat - because it was something the industry had chosen to self-regulate.
 
And one thing is fact: Paspaley did not have the recommended medical staffer available on the boat - because it was something the industry had chosen to self-regulate.

Dive medicine is a complicated science. Airlines don't put doctors on every flight, why should dive boats? Most dive accidents require a recompression chamber, not something a medic or even fully fledged doctor can pull out of their jump kits. There is no bandage, injection or pill that can fix a reverse block, the bends, air embolism, subcutaneous or mediastinal emphysema. Those things can only be done on the operating room table in hospitals.
 
The only exception is drowning. In that case, anyone on the crew with a CPR ticket (or not) can administer it to the patient, until a medevac is available.

Sometimes, in the case of minor bends, the solution is get back in the water. Although not a sanctioned practice (because the patient could lose consciousness) it's very often used as a precautionary measure or no other alternative method of recompression. Again, there is no medical proficiency required to count ten feet below the boat or to administer oxygen.
 
Like I said, the most thorough investigation, and the one with the facts, is the coroner's. Until then it would be far better for everyone to keep quiet.
(and that comes from years of experience as a journalist. I wouldn't touch a story lead by family and a possibly disgruntled ex-employee with a barge pole)
 
I think empathy for the bereaved family is in order, along with respect for the professionalism of the ABC journalists, and a mind to the importance of free speech. Perhaps you might watch the program online before making a judgement about whether it's "led by the family"? I would think it's more likely that the journalist sought out the family - and Paspaley - for comment. Also, if there are disgruntled divers prepared to speak on the program, that may well mean that some of Paspaley's business practices in that remote part of Western Australia warrant scrutiny. Australia values its workers and lives, has first-rate industrial protections, and will always investigate workplace deaths in a forensic and thorough way - even if that makes a business a little uncomfortable ...
 
Back
Top