Mystery graduated pearl necklace

[OutOfObscurity]

Hello all!

I have another mystery to solve! I just purchased this necklace from Goodwill for not much money. I loved the graduated design, and high lustre on the pearls. The smallest ones are barely 1mm, and the largest about 3mm x 5mm. The necklace is 18.5" in total length. They are an off-white with pink, blue, and golden orient. Shapes include flat, oblong, baroque, round, and disc. The clasp is not real gold, and has no markings. Part of the mystery is that I don't believe the necklace started life with the current clasp. It is attached to the strands with open jump rings that are twisted and bent. Also, the strands are all the same length, which means that they don't lay properly tiered like a triple stand necklace should. It just jumbles together! I plan on restringing them so this doesn't happen. The first crop of photos is in artificial light, and the second in natural light. I gave them a quick clean, but only after I took the natural light photos, so pardon the grime! I would love to know any opinions on place of origin, age, and if my hunch about the clasp might be correct! Thank you for all your help!
Pat

 

[Pearl Dreams]

To me they look like older Chinese freshwater pearls-- 1980s- early '90s or so.
Perhaps the pearls were originally strung differently, and the previous owner made them into a 3 strand necklace with the current clasp.

 

[OutOfObscurity]

To me they look like older Chinese freshwater pearls-- 1980s- early '90s or so.
Perhaps the pearls were originally strung differently, and the previous owner made them into a 3 strand necklace with the current clasp.

I'm excited to restring them! I just have to fine a suitable clasp to replace this one. Thanks for your help!

 

[BWeaves]

My first thought was early Chinese freshwater pearls from the 1980's or 90's because of the potato and flat button shapes. The pearls are 100% nacre.

Torsades were very popular back then. Several strands, all the same length, would be twisted and then the clasp would be closed. So when worn, the length of the necklace would get shorter, to maybe 16 inches when worn twisted.

 

[OutOfObscurity]

My first thought was early Chinese freshwater pearls from the 1980's or 90's because of the potato and flat button shapes. The pearls are 100% nacre.

Torsades were very popular back then. Several strands, all the same length, would be twisted and then the clasp would be closed. So when worn, the length of the necklace would get shorter, to maybe 16 inches when worn twisted.

I thought it might be worn like a torsade, and I tried twisting it but it looked so clunky with the graduation as extreme as it is. It also felt too fragile at the ends. Maybe it was what they were going for, but i fear it wasn't successful.

 

[pattye]

O of O, definitely a mystery! Thank you for the excellent photos. I agree with PD and BWeaves, most likely early Chinese fw pearls, still, wouldn't totally rule out naturals. With a bath and restring, they will be even more beautiful! Please show us your redesign!

 

[OutOfObscurity]

O of O, definitely a mystery! Thank you for the excellent photos. I agree with PD and BWeaves, most likely early Chinese fw pearls, still, wouldn't totally rule out naturals. With a bath and restring, they will be even more beautiful! Please show us your redesign!

Thanks Pattye, I certainly will! If anything, they might read as naturals from a distance, which is fine and dandy. Thank you for your thoughts!