SteveM
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2007
- Messages
- 1,928
In a couple of currently-active threads Tridacna pearls have surfaced. Also, a thread with Tridacna in its title was recently begun by a seller and as quickly aborted.
The Indonesian name for Tridacnidae (giant clam genus, Bivalve) is Kima. Indonesia is Tridacnidae's most varied and concentrated habitat given that country's limitless coastlines, coral reefs and remote island locations where this CITES-listed genus is still used as a sustainable, essential resource.
If an astute Los Angeles PR type could re-christen the Chinese Gooseberry 'Kiwi' to promote its adoption by New Zealand agriculture, why shouldn't the legitimate indigenous name be applied internationally to a pearl family thus far known by a name (Tridacna) more reminiscent of a treatment for teenage skin disorder? After all, we don't call Conchs 'Strombus', nor Melos 'Volute.'
I propose this thread to focus on quality Kima while discouraging appreciation for huge ugly blisters such as Pearl of Allah, or symmetrical Tridacna 'pearls' that most likely result from the pervasive carving and polishing of abundant shell material.
Below are recent acquisitions of proper examples, on the left a pair of tear drops in all but size (20 carats and 14 carats), on the right polar views of more and less flamboyantly-expressed chatoyant 'halos.' From a jewelry standpoint, there is a fine line beyond which flamboyant and highly directional chatoyance would make setting problematic, while not diminishing intrinsic value.
KIMA is an attractive and appropriate name for these potentially beautiful pearls.
This thread would also welcome examples of non-nacreous gastropod pearls of similar aspect, in the interests of attempting to discern the differences.
The Indonesian name for Tridacnidae (giant clam genus, Bivalve) is Kima. Indonesia is Tridacnidae's most varied and concentrated habitat given that country's limitless coastlines, coral reefs and remote island locations where this CITES-listed genus is still used as a sustainable, essential resource.
If an astute Los Angeles PR type could re-christen the Chinese Gooseberry 'Kiwi' to promote its adoption by New Zealand agriculture, why shouldn't the legitimate indigenous name be applied internationally to a pearl family thus far known by a name (Tridacna) more reminiscent of a treatment for teenage skin disorder? After all, we don't call Conchs 'Strombus', nor Melos 'Volute.'
I propose this thread to focus on quality Kima while discouraging appreciation for huge ugly blisters such as Pearl of Allah, or symmetrical Tridacna 'pearls' that most likely result from the pervasive carving and polishing of abundant shell material.
Below are recent acquisitions of proper examples, on the left a pair of tear drops in all but size (20 carats and 14 carats), on the right polar views of more and less flamboyantly-expressed chatoyant 'halos.' From a jewelry standpoint, there is a fine line beyond which flamboyant and highly directional chatoyance would make setting problematic, while not diminishing intrinsic value.
KIMA is an attractive and appropriate name for these potentially beautiful pearls.
This thread would also welcome examples of non-nacreous gastropod pearls of similar aspect, in the interests of attempting to discern the differences.