V
Valeria101
Guest
Tridacna... aren't many of these cultured as well?
I am not sure what to make of the message that the use of such nuclei make for an environmental threat... there seem to be economic interests of either side rather then purely environmental concerns: potentially price-competing source of larger nucleii... various degrees of ability to monitor facts and implement rules, and the questionable effects of product boycott as a way to save the planet and the environmentalists along with it. I'm getting weary of the stuff... as you might imagine.
It sounds like species decline should go along with scarcity and price rise for its products. So at least developing alternatives makes sense while boycotting output would just put more pressure on the species now and overall. But of course, why ever dedicate precious technological development to those wicket anti-green locals? When a simple import ban can convince them that starving is better than damaging the environment
I am not sure what to make of the message that the use of such nuclei make for an environmental threat... there seem to be economic interests of either side rather then purely environmental concerns: potentially price-competing source of larger nucleii... various degrees of ability to monitor facts and implement rules, and the questionable effects of product boycott as a way to save the planet and the environmentalists along with it. I'm getting weary of the stuff... as you might imagine.
It sounds like species decline should go along with scarcity and price rise for its products. So at least developing alternatives makes sense while boycotting output would just put more pressure on the species now and overall. But of course, why ever dedicate precious technological development to those wicket anti-green locals? When a simple import ban can convince them that starving is better than damaging the environment