G
gemologist
Guest
"carnauba wax-coated bamboo chips?" How do bamboo chips fit into the picture? they aren't even pearls?"
Ooh, i know this one Caitlin, the bamboo chips are wax impregnated and then they are put in a giant rolling barrel (I think they are similar to barrels used for candy-coating, but not 100% sure) this imparts the wax to the pearl and supposedly enhances the appeal.
But, being a purist when it comes to gemstones, the ones I import that are not strung, I always opt out of all of the treatments, I suppose I may loose something on luster, but I have a thing against wax impregnation and also VD, because they generally aren't lasting... put it another way, would you buy an emerald that had a coating of nail polish on it's underside? (the real answer for most people unable to spot it is yes, so long as they didn't know it was there) The chinese FW pearl suppliers aren't stupid, beauty sells, but I can't handle stuff like that in what are actually in my opinion, great pearls that only would need it if people were holding freshwater pearls to a standard that should only apply to bead nucliated pearls.
I favor full disclosure with all gemstones, and I do try with mine, but when was the last time you were told that blue topaz wasn't blue until they irradiated them? or that mystic topaz, aqua aura quartz and the like were VD coated? The truth is that if it's cheap, it doesn't need to be disclosed.
GIA is great at demanding disclosure of gemstone enhancements, but takes a huge step away from that when it comes to pearls claiming ubiquity of treatment. Personally, I don't care, I want to know if my stones didn't look that way naturally.
Thanks to Zeide for that great info on types of pearl enhancement, that's good stuff, I feel ashamed that I didn't know about some of that stuff earlier.
P.s. FW pearls usually get the dupont treatment and if your going through HK and don't want treatment BEWARE, your likely gonna get it anyways (they want to sell you stock on hand, not make new orders with the farms)
Ooh, i know this one Caitlin, the bamboo chips are wax impregnated and then they are put in a giant rolling barrel (I think they are similar to barrels used for candy-coating, but not 100% sure) this imparts the wax to the pearl and supposedly enhances the appeal.
But, being a purist when it comes to gemstones, the ones I import that are not strung, I always opt out of all of the treatments, I suppose I may loose something on luster, but I have a thing against wax impregnation and also VD, because they generally aren't lasting... put it another way, would you buy an emerald that had a coating of nail polish on it's underside? (the real answer for most people unable to spot it is yes, so long as they didn't know it was there) The chinese FW pearl suppliers aren't stupid, beauty sells, but I can't handle stuff like that in what are actually in my opinion, great pearls that only would need it if people were holding freshwater pearls to a standard that should only apply to bead nucliated pearls.
I favor full disclosure with all gemstones, and I do try with mine, but when was the last time you were told that blue topaz wasn't blue until they irradiated them? or that mystic topaz, aqua aura quartz and the like were VD coated? The truth is that if it's cheap, it doesn't need to be disclosed.
GIA is great at demanding disclosure of gemstone enhancements, but takes a huge step away from that when it comes to pearls claiming ubiquity of treatment. Personally, I don't care, I want to know if my stones didn't look that way naturally.
Thanks to Zeide for that great info on types of pearl enhancement, that's good stuff, I feel ashamed that I didn't know about some of that stuff earlier.
P.s. FW pearls usually get the dupont treatment and if your going through HK and don't want treatment BEWARE, your likely gonna get it anyways (they want to sell you stock on hand, not make new orders with the farms)