Hi all,
I was just hoping maybe I could get some clarification about the expectations of this community of pearl lovers, buyers and sellers alike, when it comes to responsibility of the buyer and the seller in the event that the goods are lost by the carrier. With the variety of business types using shipping services from all over the world represented on this thread, what are your thoughts on the matter? What are your experiences?
I recently made a relatively large purchase of a lot of pearls from which I was to select the ones I liked. I had paid for all of the pearls in advance with good faith that the seller would accept returns of the pearls I did not like. Unfortunately the entire shipment was lost by the mail carrier on its way TO me. I was not offered any particular shipping options, just that the seller suggested signature confirmation which I agreed to. Come to find out, the seller had not placed insurance on the package other than the automatic $50 that came with the shipping service- not that I could file a claim for it because I was not the shipper.
When I contacted the seller, they expressed that once the package was dropped off at USPS, it was not longer their responsibility and was "out of [their] hands". I was shocked because at least in my experience as a buyer, especially of online goods, the seller is responsible for making sure the goods reach the buyer. In the event of a carrier mishap, it is up to the seller to absorb the costs and file the claim (and add the necessary insurance)- so if an item gets lost, the seller issues a refund, then files a claim with the carrier to recover to costs.
Apparently, this is not a universal belief in the world of online commerce? Shipment and delivery are very different things. I am feeling very disillusioned about it because in my experience I have always had very secure transactions with online retailers that have a system in place to compensate the buyer in the event of non-delivery. Because at the end of the day a buyer cannot pay for what s/he didn't receive, can s/he? At least that was what I had thought until this debacle....
So I ask you PG-ers, buyers and sellers alike, is there no consensus of who has to suffer when a carrier fails? (I was under the impression that as a seller, you are enlisting the services of a third party to deliver your goods, you are technically responsible for this third party. Just like everyone else you hire to complete your job.)
What are your expectations when it comes to the perils of purchasing online?
I was just hoping maybe I could get some clarification about the expectations of this community of pearl lovers, buyers and sellers alike, when it comes to responsibility of the buyer and the seller in the event that the goods are lost by the carrier. With the variety of business types using shipping services from all over the world represented on this thread, what are your thoughts on the matter? What are your experiences?
I recently made a relatively large purchase of a lot of pearls from which I was to select the ones I liked. I had paid for all of the pearls in advance with good faith that the seller would accept returns of the pearls I did not like. Unfortunately the entire shipment was lost by the mail carrier on its way TO me. I was not offered any particular shipping options, just that the seller suggested signature confirmation which I agreed to. Come to find out, the seller had not placed insurance on the package other than the automatic $50 that came with the shipping service- not that I could file a claim for it because I was not the shipper.
When I contacted the seller, they expressed that once the package was dropped off at USPS, it was not longer their responsibility and was "out of [their] hands". I was shocked because at least in my experience as a buyer, especially of online goods, the seller is responsible for making sure the goods reach the buyer. In the event of a carrier mishap, it is up to the seller to absorb the costs and file the claim (and add the necessary insurance)- so if an item gets lost, the seller issues a refund, then files a claim with the carrier to recover to costs.
Apparently, this is not a universal belief in the world of online commerce? Shipment and delivery are very different things. I am feeling very disillusioned about it because in my experience I have always had very secure transactions with online retailers that have a system in place to compensate the buyer in the event of non-delivery. Because at the end of the day a buyer cannot pay for what s/he didn't receive, can s/he? At least that was what I had thought until this debacle....
So I ask you PG-ers, buyers and sellers alike, is there no consensus of who has to suffer when a carrier fails? (I was under the impression that as a seller, you are enlisting the services of a third party to deliver your goods, you are technically responsible for this third party. Just like everyone else you hire to complete your job.)
What are your expectations when it comes to the perils of purchasing online?