SevenOranges
Member
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
- Messages
- 15
Hello All
This is my first post here. I love jewelry and began to enjoy looking at it when I inherited some antique pieces. I am not in the industry (financial analyst I'm afraid) so please excuse some naive questions or descriptions!
I have always loved pearls, and in face when offered a ruby necklace or a pearl one, I chose the pearls. This may have been considered rather odd for a male in the family, but no one else was that interested in jewelry so it went unnoticed.
SO here is a picture of it (if I can successfully upload it). The string is short and the Gem Association and Gemological Lab Report that I had done about two years ago says there are 58 pearls. I have never counted them...and that they are all natural.
This string from family history, and let me tell you in India these stories are zealously kept, came from a larger 7 strand necklace that has long been divided between many generations of family members. However I do think one of my Mum's sisters has another string too. Hopefully I will be able to unite them and make a longer silk string. There is no clasp but it is strung in the old Indian fashion. I had them restrung when I got them (before the certification) and had them put knots between the pearls as I heard it was better for them.
The sizes mentioned in the certificate is between 3.7mm the smallest and 8.4mm for the largest. I have to say the lustre of these pearls are beautiful and they glow from across the room. However the colours seem to range from cream to rose overtones. I think you can see this well in the first picture that I took on the white paper. My aunt mentioned that several persons have mentioned that they must be "gulf" pearls, whatever that is supposed to signify, but I do think they meant it as a compliment.
Coming to the ring. This was also from the same source. The pearls look slightly larger, I would say about 10mm and really quite round. Haven't had these tested as yet so who knows, although I do have pics and stories of my great grand-mother wearing the ring. The colour is more darker and golden than the necklace. Should I bother getting it tested as well please?
This seems to be a very knowlegable group so I really look forward to your comments, and also the possibility of buying some more natural pearls matched in colour and hopefully a little larger (10-14mm) to extend the string. Any truly reliable source would be appreciated.
Thank you.
This is my first post here. I love jewelry and began to enjoy looking at it when I inherited some antique pieces. I am not in the industry (financial analyst I'm afraid) so please excuse some naive questions or descriptions!
I have always loved pearls, and in face when offered a ruby necklace or a pearl one, I chose the pearls. This may have been considered rather odd for a male in the family, but no one else was that interested in jewelry so it went unnoticed.
SO here is a picture of it (if I can successfully upload it). The string is short and the Gem Association and Gemological Lab Report that I had done about two years ago says there are 58 pearls. I have never counted them...and that they are all natural.
This string from family history, and let me tell you in India these stories are zealously kept, came from a larger 7 strand necklace that has long been divided between many generations of family members. However I do think one of my Mum's sisters has another string too. Hopefully I will be able to unite them and make a longer silk string. There is no clasp but it is strung in the old Indian fashion. I had them restrung when I got them (before the certification) and had them put knots between the pearls as I heard it was better for them.
The sizes mentioned in the certificate is between 3.7mm the smallest and 8.4mm for the largest. I have to say the lustre of these pearls are beautiful and they glow from across the room. However the colours seem to range from cream to rose overtones. I think you can see this well in the first picture that I took on the white paper. My aunt mentioned that several persons have mentioned that they must be "gulf" pearls, whatever that is supposed to signify, but I do think they meant it as a compliment.
Coming to the ring. This was also from the same source. The pearls look slightly larger, I would say about 10mm and really quite round. Haven't had these tested as yet so who knows, although I do have pics and stories of my great grand-mother wearing the ring. The colour is more darker and golden than the necklace. Should I bother getting it tested as well please?
This seems to be a very knowlegable group so I really look forward to your comments, and also the possibility of buying some more natural pearls matched in colour and hopefully a little larger (10-14mm) to extend the string. Any truly reliable source would be appreciated.
Thank you.