Is this a non-nacreous pearl, then?
Apologies for being pedantic and off-topic, but Blaire and I had an interesting discussion on this term the other day on Facebook. I've arrived at the conclusion that "non-nacreous" is a bit of a misnomer.
For all intents and purposes, nearly every mollusk is nacreous. There are exceptions. Nudibranch, octopus, squid etc, but that's because they have no shell at all.
Marketable cultured pearls as we know them are terraced aragonite, but foliated, columnar and even most calcitic structures are technically nacreous.
So if the question you are asking, is this pearl terraced aragonite? The answer would be no. If you ask is this non-nacreous? the answer would also be no, even though many non-scientists would say yes. Being a scallop, it's probably foliated aragonite.
I prefer to use the terms highly nacreous (pterioid), prismatic (clams and oysters) or calcareous (worms, corals, barnacles, though not all mollusks) to describe stuctures.
As experts, it's proper we should be mindful of correct terminology.