I find that the difference is much more obvious in person than in pictures. There is something about the nacre quality that makes freshwater pearls (even metallic ones) have a different look to them than WSS or Akoya pearls. Freshwater nacre looks almost transparent to me - like soap bubbles, while saltwater nacre seems more solid looking somehow. It's hard to describe, but I can easily tell the difference between my WSS pearls and my metallic freshwater ones, even in the same sized round studs. The FWP white color is also warmer and less silvery. More of a winter white.
Well I'm going to find you at the HK show and see what the 'longevity ' issue is. . I'll report back !
Now I'm all curious. Katbran looking forward to your investigative report
Not to put any pressure on you, Katbran, but I am also curious! Wish I could attend a show. They just don't travel to my neck of the woods.
Ok, This the Ming necklace from Wendy of Pearlescence. 13 mm to 15 mm.
View attachment 54270
This one is of my edisons. One of them has fantastic lustre. A pink glow in low light but it is actualy white.
View attachment 54269
This one is my edison from Wendy 11 mm to 13 mm.
View attachment 54268
The edison necklace has better surface and lustre but the Ming wins with size. I am not sure about longevity. I just read that quality of nacre corresponds with lustre, so I think the edisons maybe not too bad. Enjoying these ones at the moment.
.....the only question is - will they be this lustre and colour in 10 or 20 years time?
I suppose only time will tell. I don't know of any way to test it.
I hope you enjoy them for many years to come .....the only question is - will they be this lustre and colour in 10 or 20 years time?
What do you think? Will they last for 20 years? It would be good if you could clarify.