A
Ashley
Guest
Hi Everybody-
I found this article in National Jeweler Online (one of my daily trade newsletters) and thought everybody on the forum might find this interesting...
Tiffany's trademark lawsuit against eBay opens
November 14, 2007
New York?Tiffany and Co.'s trademark lawsuit against eBay opened on Tuesday with a lawyer for Tiffany and Co. reportedly saying eBay turned a "blind eye" to the sale of counterfeit Tiffany jewelry on its Web site, according to a Reuters report.
An eBay lawyer in turn said the Web site fulfilled its obligations in preventing the sale of counterfeit goods, and it was up to Tiffany and Co. to police its trademarks, the report said.
The trial, which is being held without a jury before U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in Manhattan, is scheduled to continue through Nov. 21. It is being closely watched as a case that could set a legal precedent on who is responsible for policing the Web for counterfeit products, a monitoring job that would undoubtedly prove costly, according to experts.
"EBay has disclaimed the responsibility for sale of counterfeit items on its site," James Swire, Tiffany's lawyer, said in Tuesday's opening statements, according to Reuters.
"EBay simply turned a blind eye," Swire told the judge. "Because of that, it is liable for contributory infringement."
The auction site's lawyer, Bruce Rich, said eBay spends more than $10 million a year to "cleanse its site of counterfeit merchandise," the report said.
He cited eBay's verified rights owners (VeRO) program, which helps companies prevent fake goods from being sold on its site, as one example.
In court papers, Tiffany has argued that if it were required to police auctions it would be less effective and more expensive than automatic screening by eBay, reported Reuters.
In a separate lawsuit this past August, Tiffany was awarded $1 million as part of a court settlement that enjoined Starglam and its principal, John Shamir, from producing what the retailer alleged was counterfeit Tiffany merchandise.
I found this article in National Jeweler Online (one of my daily trade newsletters) and thought everybody on the forum might find this interesting...
Tiffany's trademark lawsuit against eBay opens
November 14, 2007
New York?Tiffany and Co.'s trademark lawsuit against eBay opened on Tuesday with a lawyer for Tiffany and Co. reportedly saying eBay turned a "blind eye" to the sale of counterfeit Tiffany jewelry on its Web site, according to a Reuters report.
An eBay lawyer in turn said the Web site fulfilled its obligations in preventing the sale of counterfeit goods, and it was up to Tiffany and Co. to police its trademarks, the report said.
The trial, which is being held without a jury before U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in Manhattan, is scheduled to continue through Nov. 21. It is being closely watched as a case that could set a legal precedent on who is responsible for policing the Web for counterfeit products, a monitoring job that would undoubtedly prove costly, according to experts.
"EBay has disclaimed the responsibility for sale of counterfeit items on its site," James Swire, Tiffany's lawyer, said in Tuesday's opening statements, according to Reuters.
"EBay simply turned a blind eye," Swire told the judge. "Because of that, it is liable for contributory infringement."
The auction site's lawyer, Bruce Rich, said eBay spends more than $10 million a year to "cleanse its site of counterfeit merchandise," the report said.
He cited eBay's verified rights owners (VeRO) program, which helps companies prevent fake goods from being sold on its site, as one example.
In court papers, Tiffany has argued that if it were required to police auctions it would be less effective and more expensive than automatic screening by eBay, reported Reuters.
In a separate lawsuit this past August, Tiffany was awarded $1 million as part of a court settlement that enjoined Starglam and its principal, John Shamir, from producing what the retailer alleged was counterfeit Tiffany merchandise.